The publication, Practical Guide No. 6: Business Centres - Domiciliation Activities, is aimed at operators providing registered office, business address and domiciliation services to companies and other legal entities. While these businesses have been subject to Monaco's AML legislation since 2022, the new guide provides the first comprehensive explanation of the regulator's expectations for the sector.
A Sector Under Increased Scrutiny
The guide confirms that business centres were brought within the scope of Law No. 1.362 following recommendations issued by MONEYVAL. As a result, domiciliation providers are now expected to implement the same risk-based AML controls found across other regulated sectors. According to the AMSF there are 23 business centres in Monaco with approximately 2,700 clients.
Interestingly, the AMSF notes that only the domiciliation activity itself falls within the AML framework. Other services commonly offered by business centres, such as office rental, meeting rooms, reception services or administrative support, are not automatically subject to AML obligations unless they form part of a domiciliation relationship.
The regulator's sector risk assessment classified customer risk as "moderately high", while identifying controls within the sector as generally insufficient. This reflects concerns that domiciliation services can be misused to create an appearance of legitimacy while concealing the true ownership or activities of companies.
Why Domiciliation Services Matter
The guide highlights a number of vulnerabilities commonly associated with domiciliation providers internationally.
These include:
- Use of shell companies and nominee arrangements.
- Attempts to conceal beneficial ownership.
- Multiple entities controlled by the same individuals operating from the same address.
- Complex cross-border ownership structures.
- Dormant or non-operational companies.
- Misuse of business addresses to create a false commercial presence.
Enhanced Focus on Beneficial Ownership
A recurring theme throughout the guide is the need to identify the natural persons ultimately controlling a client structure.
Business centres are expected to go beyond reviewing incorporation documents and must understand:
- Who ultimately owns or controls the entity.
- Why the structure exists.
- Whether the ownership chain has a genuine economic purpose.
- Whether there are links to high-risk jurisdictions, politically exposed persons (PEPs) or sanctioned parties.
The guide contains practical examples involving nominee shareholders, layered offshore structures and sanctions circumvention risks, all of which are identified as situations requiring enhanced scrutiny and potentially the filing of a suspicious transaction report.
Beyond identifying ownership, the guide repeatedly stresses the importance of assessing the economic rationale and substance of structures. The question is not simply who owns the company, but whether the structure serves a legitimate commercial purpose and whether its activities are consistent with the information provided.
Understanding the Client's Economic Reality
One practical implication of the guide is that business centres may increasingly need to obtain financial and commercial information about their clients in order to demonstrate an adequate understanding of the client's activities and risk profile. While the AMSF does not impose a blanket obligation to collect financial statements from every domiciliation client, the guide repeatedly emphasises the need to understand the client's business activities, socio-economic background, source of funds and economic purpose. In practice, this may require the review of annual accounts, management accounts, property schedules, business plans or other supporting documentation, particularly where the client is an established company, a property-holding structure, a complex international group, a trust-related arrangement, or a higher-risk customer. The key regulatory question is not whether financial statements have been collected in every case, but whether the domiciliation provider can demonstrate that it has obtained sufficient information to understand the client's economic reality and verify that the declared activity is consistent with the structure being domiciled.Remote Onboarding and Sanctions Risks
The AMSF also reiterates that remote onboarding creates higher AML risk.
Where a client is not physically present, business centres must apply enhanced due diligence measures, including additional identification checks and ensuring that the first payment originates from an account held in the client's name with a regulated financial institution.
Particular attention is also given to sanctions compliance. The guide makes clear that screening against Monaco's asset-freezing lists is not a one-time exercise. Screening must be conducted both at onboarding and throughout the business relationship whenever sanctions lists are updated.
Governance and Compliance Expectations
The guide serves as a reminder that business centres must maintain a full AML compliance framework, including:
- A documented business-wide risk assessment.
- Written AML procedures tailored to the firm's activities.
- Appointment of an AML compliance officer.
- Staff training programmes.
- Annual reporting obligations to the AMSF.
- Ongoing customer due diligence and monitoring.
- Internal controls and compliance testing.
What This Means for Monaco Businesses
The publication demonstrates Monaco's continued focus on improving AML effectiveness rather than simply expanding legislation. By providing sector-specific guidance, the AMSF is seeking to improve the quality of compliance within professions that historically may not have considered themselves part of the financial crime prevention framework.
For business centres and domiciliation providers, the message is clear: providing a company address is no longer viewed as a purely administrative service. Regulators increasingly regard domiciliation providers as a critical first line of defence in identifying opaque structures, hidden beneficial owners, sanctions risks, unexplained sources of wealth, and other forms of financial crime. In many cases, this will require a deeper understanding of the client's business operations and financial profile than has historically been expected of the sector.
Although the guide is directed at business centres and domiciliation providers, many of its observations will also resonate with trust and corporate service providers (TCSPs). The AMSF's emphasis on understanding beneficial ownership, economic substance, source of wealth, complex structures and the genuine purpose of legal entities reflects themes that are equally central to TCSP compliance frameworks and regulatory expectations in Monaco and other international financial centres.
How Rosemont Can Help
Rosemont Consulting assists Monaco-based business centres, domiciliation providers, corporate service providers and other regulated businesses with AML/CFT compliance. Our services include business-wide risk assessments, AML procedures, compliance officer support, sanctions screening frameworks, training programmes, internal controls and regulatory remediation projects designed to meet AMSF and MONEYVAL expectations.
For more information, please contact consulting@rosemont.mc
Follow us on LinkedIn and don't miss our updates about Monaco, Malta, Mauritius, and the yachting industry.